Kamala Defeats Self Despite Best Effort
She tried her hardest to not try.
Running against herself is the smartest thing Kamala Harris ever did. It wasn’t her idea because nothing is. Oh, and it didn’t work. But pretending she was a different being was as close as she’ll ever get to her dream job. It’s tough to get fired from being president and a guaranteed path to publishing a book you don’t even have to write.
Kamala’s natural tendency to self-incriminate by listing perverse Bizarro accomplishments was only canceled out by her unparalleled incoherence. We could tell she prepared her oral report on the bus. Like Bart Simpson, Kamala knows Libya is a land of contrasts. Talking did not help the case of someone who had only claims.
Dodging humans while running to reign over them is a Democratic tradition. Her theoretical superior Joe Biden spent the 2020 election not running for an office he won, and his lieutenant grasped the precedent. And you say she never learns.
I hate to be cynical. But the technical commander-in-chief presently showing his Stretch Armstrong doll to a portrait of James Polk is not a noble leader at heart who reluctantly accepted an office he never craved for the good of a nation that needed him. Seizing to grift is what good government is about.
Hiding from questions about ideas that obviously fail is simply the best strategy. Well, changing to a philosophy that works would be better. That said, presume Democrats will remain stubborn about sticking with failure. When your beliefs make money worthless, it’s best not to appear on camera and discuss them.
A typical voter would think it was important to know what a potential president believed. That’s especially so in a rather pushy era where whatever notions that this one particular person holds defined the government and everything else. But there’s nothing typical about journalists. Let them think that’s praise. Very fair reporters believe benevolent leaders should be infesting every part of existence with politics and also couldn’t bother to unearth Kamala’s details.
Curiosity about what a contender believes evaded communications professionals who are supposedly even more inquisitive than most. Harris is known for combination of Khmer Rouge-style economic planning with greater emphasis on DEI along with the very specific sense that good things are good. But you had to piece her insipidly twisted ideology together from results instead of from anything a clever querier got her to admit.
Emblematic enablers vainly tried to help Kamala by avoiding her like her spouse has a screenplay. To Democratic spies working behind enemy lines at home, objectivity means assisting the object of their dreams. The campaign and media combined to create a cloudy concept of a candidate who was full of joy. They were half-right: she’s full of it.
Journalists’ best excuse is ineptness. It’s little wonder they’re Kamala fans. The ever-fair media doesn’t even feign offering anything as dull as facts. Cosplay enthusiasts used to at least go through with playing the role. I suppose we should feel grateful they’ve dispensed with hoodwinking. Honesty about being deceitful is as close as today’s professional stenographers get to truth.
A commitment to cheerleading over career success didn’t help either way. Journalists actually interested in the job’s tasks could’ve set themselves up to make a fortune by seeking an exclusive interview revolving around getting her to admit anything she believes, or at least tries to explain. Yet they’d rather protect the queen to fulfill their duty as hive members. A profession that’s already disreputable features employees who strive to make themselves as obsolete as newsprint.
I’m almost impressed at unabashed zealots in allegedly nonpartisan roles finding more blatant ways to be biased. Treating Barack Obama as the real savior was relatively dispassionate compared to Kamala’s hyper-hagiographic coverage. If you want to keep eternal infant Donald Trump from legitimately crying about being treated unfairly, stop creating evidence.
Mendaciousness may fail as a calculation. A prime example is spending an election acting as if the first in line was the one person who had suffered most from the Joe Biden presidency. She was right, although not in the way claimed. The best argument during a singularly disastrous term was that the vice president had precisely zero input. When it comes to this one vapid individual, it may have been convincing.
Kamala believes in original American values so old-fashioned that they precede many constitutional alterations. The nostalgic applicant preferred the old way where the losing presidential foe got to be second in command. The contemporary Aaron Burr acted like she ascended to the vice presidency pre-12th Amendment style. That’s the only way it would’ve made sense that she disagreed with everything the person in charge did. She doesn’t respect any of America’s rulebook, so the order of succession shouldn’t be any different.
Holding a grudge is a Democratic specialty along with making money valueless. Acting as if she were Joe Biden’s adversary would have been unconvincing even if she wasn’t as uncharismatic as Kevin Costner on edibles. She adhered to her precedent of nastiness set during 2020's failed lunge for the Democratic nomination. It did lead to her making a successful push to be the supreme underling. The one person who should galvanize amity held a grudge. Hating her boss also let her purport to protest his price-increasing policies.
Nobody could deny plausible deniability was implausible. It may be shocking to learn that the vice president is in the same administration. Her prominence in making decisions became even more glaring when the ostensible executive began publicly coping with oatmeal brain. Practicing his signature to forge on an updated will that just happens to be beneficial to the counterfeiter is just one of the office’s tasks.
Kamala inspires as long as she doesn’t talk. Doing anything counters her heartening image even more deeply. But Democrats aren’t about to hold any of their heroes to unreachable standards like coherency or progress. Focus on such pedestrian matters is for greedy business vultures. Inflation means ostensibly record profits aren’t worth as much as they appear, but the warped number is all that matters to distorters of mathematics.
Projecting their dreams on doltish aspiring saviors is as much a Democratic tradition as believing every dissenter is hateful. The custom resembles how their initiatives work, or rather don’t work. Claiming they’re for equality where everyone gets screwed is valid in a way.
Politicians are articulate only while exposing why they shouldn’t hold power. The overextension is precisely why there are limits. And the practical flaunting of why liberals prove themselves incorrect is why they resent a quite confining Constitution. Embarrassment at failure is just another reason aspiring goons loathe the Founding Fathers.
The practical effects are punishment enough. Unfortunately, liberals believe in communalism, which means everyone suffers. Kamala feels terrible about ruining the economy because it kept her from being president. She also cares that you can’t afford bread in the sense that your kvetching irks her. Empathy is her strong suit.
Democrats who sell blather as opposed to useful products are able to get themselves elected despite constantly harming those voting. Her struggles with English reflected those with finances. Consistency can be a blessing even when it’s unintended.